Here’s a List of Things to Do Before Amy Coney Barrett Helps Make Them Illegal
With Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation to the Supreme Court, the conservative majority is now 6-3. Before Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, the conservative majority was only 5-4 which meant that the four liberal justices only had to convince one conservative justice to side with them. That was oftentimes Chief Justice John Roberts, but even with his potential swing vote, the conservative justices now decisively rule the Supreme Court.
Since justices on the Supreme Court have lifetime appointments, Barrett will have decades to push her beliefs on the American public. The precedents she has set during her time as a judge in the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals along with her writings have demonstrated how she will behave when certain types of cases reach her desk.
To help you understand the consequences of Barrett’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court, I have compiled the following list of things that you should do before she and the rest of the conservative majority overturn or take them away.
Be Gay
On Wednesday, Nov. 4, the Supreme Court reviewed Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, a case where a lower court’s decision effectively prohibited discrimination against same-sex couples by adoption agencies. As Barrett is a member of and has delivered lectures for the Alliance Defending Freedom, an anti-LGBTQ+ organization that has been designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, the extent of her direct affiliation with this organization is telling of how she would behave when she votes on this case. Protecting the ability of adoption agencies to discriminate against LGBTQ+ couples would then set a dangerous precedent that could ultimately impact Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), which made gay marriage legal nationwide, as well as Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia (2020), which effectively protects employees from being discriminated against by their employers because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Before Barrett has the chance to change or influence these decisions, go out and be gay. Get married, adopt, hold a job and do everything else that people do whilst gay. “Be gay, do crimes.”
Have Affordable Healthcare
During a pandemic, widespread access to quality, affordable healthcare is more important than ever. Not for Barrett. The Affordable Care Act (ACA), colloquially known as Obamacare, helped 20 million people gain health care coverage, yet it faces another legal challenge before the Supreme Courtthe week after the election. Barrett criticized Chief Justice John Roberts’ past reasoning to uphold the ACA in a 2017 article. That, along with her general conservative leanings, serves as proof to many on how she will vote in the case challenging the legality of the legislation. Even if the ACA makes it past the Supreme Court this time, it will undoubtedly come up again and millions of Americans have the potential to lose essential coverage for their health.
Once again, before the conservative majority strips people of healthcare, go and get preventative care. Get a check-up, get a flu shot and…have that mole looked at.
Have Reproductive Freedom
Barrett’s personal views on abortion became evident throughout her time at the University of Notre Dame, especially when she added her name to an ad that implored for the “barbaric legacy” of Roe v. Wade to be overturned. Despite Barrett’s silence on how she would rule on these cases during her confirmation hearings, Donald Trump had previously promised to only nominate pro-life justices to the Court, which indicates her leanings.
Though she is by herself incapable of overturning Roe v. Wade, she did say at Jacksonville University, “I think the question of whether people can get very late-term abortions, you know, how many restrictions can be put on clinics, I think that will change.”
The Supreme Court will more likely take on cases that slowly remove access to abortions and birth control. A case like Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which prohibited laws causing undue burden to women seeking abortions, would line up with what Barrett wishes to overturn. During her confirmation hearings, Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the case that legalized birth control, was brought to Barrett’s attention, but she refused to agree that the decision was made correctly. As such, it is seemingly plausible that access to birth control will be restricted since many states have not drawn the line between birth control or abortion.
With reproductive freedom on the line, go and get that vasectomy or tubal ligation or, if you are looking for something less permanent, a long-term IUD lasts from three-six years which will hopefully give you enough time to move somewhere else.
Not Get Shot
When it comes to guns, Barrett’s positions are historically unprecedented. In the case Kanter v. Barr (7th Cir. 2019), it was ruled that even people with non-violent convictions should not be able to get a gun. Barrett wrote a 37-page essay dissenting that vote. Though the ban on all felons owning firearms may go too far, her reasoning that there was no historical precedent to allow for such a ban is a little concerning. Machine guns for civilians weren’t banned until the 1980s and there weren’t background checks for gun purchases until 1993. The founding fathers didn’t think guns would be being sold at Walmart when they wrote the constitution, so there being no historical precedent is an irritating and tiresome explanation in a constantly changing world. UCLA law professor Adam Smith elaborates on how far this could go, “Does that mean that there’s a constitutional right to have machine guns because there’s no strong historical precedent for banning those weapons?”
So before any and all gun control is repealed or overturned, go on a walk and enjoy not getting shot with a machine gun.
Remember What It’s Like to Have a Competent President
If there is a major dispute involving the election, any kind of legal battle will likely go to the Supreme Court. Given the Court’s conservative majority and the three justices he appointed, the vote will go to Trump and the American public will be stuck with four more years of an incompetent man-child as president. So move to Canada while you have a chance to truly experience a semi-coherent president.
Though this is certainly not a comprehensive list, new U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett will make the lives of so many Americans more difficult and less safe. Until that officially happens, be gay, have some reproductive freedom, don’t get shot, and enjoy some semblance of affordable healthcare.
Your donation will support the student journalists of Saint Louis University.
Dylan • Nov 21, 2020 at 9:02 pm
Attacking a woman because she is a woman that holds particular faith beliefs and judicial philosophies is sexist garabage. We should be celebrating strong, intellegent women who are added to the court, but self proclaimeed feminists would rather show their true colors. You probably loath conservative women and you will vilify them, even if it means fewer women in positions of power.
The content of this article is even worse than it’s sexist nature. Should we treat your words as a joke like the meme “Be gay, Do Crime” or take them seriously? Because you’ve completely missed the point of the Supreme Court. SCOTUS’s main role is to interpret the US Constitution, a document that can be amended by supermajorities of Congress or by the States. ACB has no power over what the Constitution says, but only how narrow or broad the terms are applied. Therefore, this false narrative that she creates policy is wrong and unfortunately you’ve fallen prey to political hack talking points.
Elle • Nov 19, 2020 at 8:25 pm
Thank you Penelope!! This was very well written and outlined VERY important issues. Having Amy Coney Barrett on the supreme court is honestly terrifying for so many people. I appreciate you raising awareness to these issues.
Lexi • Nov 19, 2020 at 7:02 pm
You’re absolutely right that Barrett’s confirmation means steps backward and not steps forward. A meaningful article that leaves a lot to think about. Thank you for sharing.
Grace • Nov 19, 2020 at 3:20 pm
Penelope, THANK YOU for speaking your mind on this important topic. It is our duty as citizens to speak from our hearts and stand up for what we believe may be an injustice. This OPINION article holds so much power and I thank you for being so open and honest and shedding light on this issue, real issues we all need to see. I appreciate you.
Morgan • Nov 19, 2020 at 3:18 pm
I appreciate the concerns raised in the piece. The Supreme Court, like any branch of government, can have a significant impact on the daily lives of Americans, especially those who are most vulnerable and I think this article does a good job highlighting the real and valid fears that individuals are facing in light of Barrett’s confirmation.
Riley • Nov 19, 2020 at 3:17 pm
A great piece as always. However, I fail to understand some of the people in the comments, if you’re opposed to abortion then just don’t get one? It isn’t your job to regulate other people’s bodies.
Also who cares if the church opposes these things? America was founded with the idea that church and state are separate, if these things bother you then you oughta have a better reason than “religion”.
Becky • Nov 19, 2020 at 3:07 pm
I too am fearing what will come of this SCOTUS change … Ruth will be missed dearly. I’m glad you’re speaking on these issues, because they are real concerns for our nation. Your OPINION article speaks truth to power and I appreciate it.
A Catholic • Nov 19, 2020 at 2:14 pm
Does this Catholic school’s news outlet know what kinds of anti-catholic rhetoric they’re churning out? Abortion and birth control are harmful things, both physically and spiritually. Barrett, a woman with many children who is now on the Supreme Court, should serve as a powerful example that women do not need to stifle their natural, God-given abilities to be able to pursue a career.
Also, the Church does not condone gay actions becuase it goes against the intrinsic natural purpose for which God created us: procreation. True love comes from living sinners OUT OF their sin, not encouraging sin via immoral practices like this article is doing. The author seems to be unaware of the immense freedom one can live when leaving their sinful habits behind, and is instead telling people to go and sin, which will not be fulfilling to people in the slightest. Justice Barrett is going to be the moral fresh of breath air our Godless society needs. Please repent.
Managing Editor • Nov 19, 2020 at 3:29 pm
We are an independent student news organization not affiliated with Saint Louis University or the Catholic Church, and we are a voice for students of all backgrounds and faiths. If you feel strongly, please feel free to submit an article to our opinion section, at [email protected].
Audrey • Nov 19, 2020 at 2:09 pm
Grace, I might not agree with everything you said but I understand your viewpoint & thank you for sharing your opinion.
@Ted & Gerry & Heartland Patriot, your comments were pretty disheartening and frankly sexist. The way to disagree with someone is not to sit on your computer and degrade someone with cruel words & no facts and then complain about the article not having any. Something to think about.
George Lawrence • Nov 19, 2020 at 2:06 pm
This is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read, and I’ve read a lot of UNews articles.
Dr.Fetus Deletus • Nov 19, 2020 at 1:51 pm
^^^Incel spotted^^^
Sam • Nov 19, 2020 at 1:06 pm
Oof
Eric • Nov 18, 2020 at 10:20 am
This article is complete rubbish, there is little in it that can be considered anything more than inveigling and obfuscation of facts and reality. Penelope Gardner aptly demonstrates her age (18 or 19) and incomplete education, however she throughly demonstrates her indoctrination into extreme liberalism. Apparently Gardner hasn’t been educated in the fact that the SCOTUS does not make law, it interpret’s the laws as to constitutionality and legality brought before it and nothing further. The state legislatures and Congress make laws, not the courts. Poor little Penelope has a lot of learning to do and some irrational indoctrination to lose. As it seems though that she can write articles far removed from reality she really has a ways to go before she can be granted the title of a rational and logical adult.
Ted • Nov 14, 2020 at 9:55 pm
Nothing like a lot of baseless indoctrination and zero facts, eh ladies? Your melodramatic pseudo-truths are intensely amusing. What do you think continues to keep our conservative home fires burning?
Good luck with that.
Gerry • Nov 14, 2020 at 4:28 am
Ridiculous. Supreme Court Justices don’t impose their personal agenda on the country. Hasn’t happened since Marbury v. Madison in 1803, and it’s arguable if it occurred then. There are lots of things to worry about in this world. One out of nine Supreme Court Justices doesn’t make the list.
Heartland Patriot • Nov 13, 2020 at 5:24 pm
“The founding fathers didn’t think guns would be being sold at Walmart when they wrote the constitution…”
First of all, it’s “The Founding Fathers”, capitalized since it’s a title for a group. Second thing, they didn’t expect whiny kids would write stories electronically, and have them spread around as if those stories were some kind of facts, but of course, here we are. Really, if you could step outside of things for just a minute, and really look at what you wrote, you’d see just how absolutely hyperbolic and ridiculous you sound. I won’t hold my breath expecting that to happen.